Knowledge base
  • Goal of knowledge base
  • Linux & core
    • Linux
      • Record SSH session for reporting
      • Compress / Decompress files
      • Colorize logs
      • Cron output & logging
      • Signal
      • Break out and escape SSH session
      • Mount volume permanently
      • Show processes most consuming CPU & MEM
      • Improve and optimize battery life on Linux
      • File ownership & groups in linux
      • Automatic security update/patch on Ubuntu
      • Clean buffers and cached on linux
      • Bash completion on Linux/Mac
    • Core services
      • Nginx reload
      • OpenVPN Split tunneling
      • Nmap commands
    • Hardware
      • CPU Architecture fundamental
  • Database
    • MySQL
      • InnoDB - innodb_file_per_table parameter
      • MySQL - enable slow query log
      • MySQL - export large tables
    • MongoDB
  • Container
    • Docker
      • ADD or COPY in Dockerfile
        • Clean data of docker completely
    • Podman
  • Automation
    • Ansible
      • Output format
  • Build & Deployment
    • Jenkins
      • Jenkins - force exit pipeline when failure
  • Language & Toolset
    • PHP
      • Composer
      • php-redis & php-igbinary
  • Mindset
    • Technical based
      • Writing well
      • Reinvent The Wheel
      • Approach a new system
      • Backup philosophy
      • Mindset for building HA and scalable system
      • GitLab database incident
    • Non-technical based
      • How to read news efficiency?
      • How long should you nap?
      • Assume good faith
  • Reference & learning source
    • Books
      • Sysadmin/SRE
      • Mindsets
      • Software fundamentals
    • English
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Mindset
  2. Non-technical based

Assume good faith

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith

PreviousHow long should you nap?NextBooks

Last updated 6 years ago

Assuming good faith (AGF) is a fundamental principle on . It is the assumption that editors' edits and comments are made in . Most people try to help the project, not hurt it. If this were untrue, a project like Wikipedia would be doomed from the beginning. This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of obvious evidence to the contrary ( ). Assuming good faith does not prohibit discussion and criticism. Rather, editors should not attribute the actions being criticized to unless there is specific evidence of such.

When disagreement occurs, try to the best of your ability to explain and resolve the problem, not cause more conflict, and so give others the opportunity to reply in kind. Consider whether a dispute stems from different perspectives, and look for ways to reach .

When doubt is cast on good faith, continue to assume good faith yourself when possible. Be and follow , rather than editors or with them. If you wish to express doubts about the conduct of fellow , please substantiate those doubts with specific and other relevant evidence, so that people can understand the basis for your concerns. Although bad conduct may seem to be due to bad faith, it is usually best to address the conduct without mentioning motives, which might exacerbate resentments all around.

Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. Just as one can incorrectly judge that another is acting in bad faith, so too can one mistakenly conclude that bad faith is being assumed; exhortations to "Assume Good Faith" can themselves .

Everyone makes mistakes, both behavioral (such as ) and content-based (such as adding ). Most of the time, we can correct such mistakes with simple reminders. However, there will be disagreements on Wikipedia for which no policy or guideline has an easy answer. When disagreements happen, ill intent may not be involved. Keep a , and consider if disagreements seem intractable; many of them are not.

Violation of policies—such as engaging in , violating , and so on—may be perpetrated in either good or bad faith. There are processes for dealing with all of these, and for repeated violation of policy will apply regardless of whether bad faith was involved or not.

Wikipedia
good faith
e.g.
vandalism
malice
consensus
civil
dispute resolution procedures
attacking
edit-warring
Wikipedians
diffs
reflect negative assumptions about others
personal attacks
original research
cool head
dispute resolution
sock-puppetry
consensus
sanctions